Monday, October 18, 2010

New Look Patriots, Old ways



When the New England Patriots acquired wide receiver Randy Moss in 2007 their entire offense changed for years to come. The Pats became a passing and finesse team that threw long bombs down field and scored an incredible 36.8 points per game. The offense had changed from a running, short passing, and clock eating attack to an instant strike high-octane unit. This style of offense did lead to an NFL record 50 touchdown passes for Tom Brady, 23 receiving touchdowns for Moss, and an undefeated season with a trip to the Super Bowl. However, in the end when the offense stalled the defense could not hold off a late drive, and the Patriots were defeated. The crushing 17-14 loss to the New York Giants left the Patriots standing at the alter for the perfect season, forever remembered as the 18-1 team.

For the next two seasons the offense became centered on throwing deep to Randy Moss and working the underneath routes to Wes Welker. No longer an offense that throws to the open receiver, runs the football, orchestrates long drives, and was no longer an unpredictable attack. Moss was incredible that first season and even became a surprise leader in his second season with the Pats. Randy Moss rose to the challenge of being an offensive leader in 2008 (along with Welker) by helping transform Matt Cassel into an NFL starter. 

2008 was Cassel's first year as a starter, and his first time starting a game since High School. Randy set the tone for Cassel early in the season, right after Brady left the first game injured. With 116 yards receiving and a touchdown the Patriots won without their Hall of Fame QB. Moss also caught a touchdown with 0:01 left on the clock to send a game into overtime against the Jets. This game did result in a loss, but Moss helped Cassel's development immensely by being there for him in the clutch. Randy Moss was elected an offensive team captain in 2008 and he truly filled the leadership role. His 1,008 yards receiving and eleven touchdowns that year earned him the role of "captian"again for 2009.

The 2009 production (in terms of statistics) from Moss was still at a high level with 1,264 yards and 13 touchdowns, however these numbers are misleading. Moss had eight games with zero touchdowns and the offense stalled at times trying too hard to feed the ball deep to Moss. With the return of Tom Brady the Patriots attempted to restore the magic from 2007. The problem with this became that it was no longer an effective strategy and the offense became too predictable. Brady is more suited for a ball control offense with short to intermediate routes, and one that features the open receiver. This is what we all saw in yesterday's victory over the Baltimore Ravens as The Patriots offensive had success by spreading the ball around and churning out first downs. The old Patriot way is back in town and the team is better off for it.

As for Randy Moss this deal works out best for him as well. He does very well with new starts in new places (particularly in a first season) and now he can be featured more in Minnesota. Now the greatest deep threat of all time is paired up with the greatest deep passer in NFL history. Moss will be thrown to more often as a Viking, will feel comfortable in a place where he came into the league, and for his sake hopefully get the money he is looking for.

Sources Used

www.espn.com
www.si.com
www.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/basketball/nba/
www.weei.com



Saturday, October 2, 2010

Full Cirlce



Some say Michael Vick came full circle last season when he ran and threw for a touchdowns against his former team (in Atlanta). Where the fans chanted "we want Vick" despite their hometown team losing. This must have been some vindication for Vick after the organization's and city's falling out with him (in the wake of the notorious dog fighting scandal). Others tell you it was recently when he started his first game since 2006 and defeated the now 0-3 Detriot Lions. However, I say his true full circle unfolds this Sunday afternoon. Michael Vick is about to play in what is perhaps his biggest game since returning to the NFL.

Vick has returned from the rock bottom of his career (banned from the league) to again lead a team into a huge rivalry driven, in division NFC match up. This all important divisional showdown will be the first time in many years that a team has believed and trusted in Vick (as the starter) to lead them to victory. While diving into the stands (last season) and basking in the glory of re-acceptance by the Atlanta fan base was important to his NFL revival, Vick now has his true second chance to solidify himself as that franchise quarterback.


Vick became the face of the Atlanta Falcons franchise by leading them to the playoffs twice. including a trip NFC Championship. The Vick led Falcons were one game shy of facing the New England Patriots in Super Bowl 39, but lost to the Philadelphia Eagles 27-10. Two years prior in the 2002 NFC Divisional Playoff game, Vick's team also lost to the Eagles by only managing 6 points, in a 20-6 defeat. The opposing quarterback in both of Vick's playoff defeats was none other than Donovan McNabb. McNabb was  the face of the Philadelphia Eagles from 2000-2009 with a 92-49 (in game's started) record and led the team to  a super bowl and five NFC Championship games. In 2009 McNabb lobbied for his team to acquire Vick who became the Eagles third string quarterback in 2009. Now as a member of the struggling Washington Redskins, McNabb must face his old city, old fans, old team, and their new leader Michael Vick.


This is only a week four match up, but there is drama thriving beneath the surface, despite McNabb's claim "it's just another game". There is much on the line for these two quarterbacks on Sunday. McNabb will want to defeat the man who has replaced him, and Vick will want to prove himself as a worthy replacement in the city of brotherly love. What makes this game so hard to predict is that it is difficult to see the McNabb/Mike Shannahan Redskins dropping to 1-3. It is also hard to see McNabb not playing well in such a big game. A game that has him returning to the place where he became great. On the other side it is hard to see the Eagles not playing well, as they have been such a revitalized offensive team under Vick. The  new Eagles  quarterback is back in his top form and is such a dynamic player that in the end it seems safest to say the Eagles take this game, 27-20. If the Eagles do indeed win; in steps Michael Vick and out steps Donovan McNabb as the face of the Philadelphia Eagles.

Sources Used

www.espn.com
www.si.com
www.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/basketball/nba/
www.weei.com

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Lack of Patience Hurt Patriots



Mark Sanchez silenced his critics across the media and NFL world (including me) against the Patriots this past Sunday. Perhaps we should not all be so surprised when you take a look at the weapons around the second year quarterback. In my last post I spoke of how easy it should be for Sanchez to score if he got LaDainian Tomlinson, Dustin Keller, and Braylon Edwards involved in the offense, and that is exactly what he did. I still do not believe in Mark Sanchez as a truly consistent NFL leader, and there will come a time this season where this fact resurfaces to harm the Jets. For now I'll try and digest how this possibly happened to the Patriots against such a young and inconsistent quarterback. The true reason the Patriots lost this game 28-14 was due to their incredibly atrocious game plan.

The Patriots seemed to have no patience at all in the second half, as all they attempted to do was bomb deep passes unsucessfully to Randy Moss. What made Tom Brady a three time super bowl champion was a simple philosophy, one that he and the Patriots forgot against the Jets. "My favorite reciever is the open man" was always Brady's M.O. and now it seems that he cannot help forcing the ball to Moss. New England began the second half with a 14-10 lead, stopped the Jets opening drive, and got the ball back. At this point the Patriots needed so stay with what had gotten them to this very point, keep moving the chains. Work the underneath routes with the tight ends, Wes Welker, Julian Edelman, and churn out first downs. It is important to stretch out the defense with deep passes down field, but only after you have worked the underneath routes and running game. Moss did have an impressive touchdown reception, but it was followed by a two catch, ten attempt overall performance.

 A deep threat is an important part of any passing game and the Patriots will need Moss to provide that. However, he cannot be the only main feed for your offense, and the Patriots had no excuses for a zero point second half. The game plan was terrible in the closing quarters and the execution was even worse. Thankfully the Patriots have a good week of practice ahead of them and then a chance to hone their skills against an easy opponent this weekend, in the Buffalo Bills. Patriots 31 Bills 14.



Sources Used

www.espn.com
www.si.com
www.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/basketball/nba/
www.weei.com

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Patriots Over Jets



New York Jets quarterback Mark Sanchez was quoted saying "There is nothing wrong with going 15-1" after a loss to the Baltimore Ravens. Perhaps his coach Rex Ryan put him up to saying that because that comment is dillusional. Last Monday night Sanchez looked horrible with well under 100 yards passing and zero touchdowns. The Jets defense looked masterful, but the offense was non exisistant and inexcusably so. With the weapons at his disposal its a wonder that Sanchez is still unable to score touchdowns. All you'd have to do is throw the ball to LaDainian Tomlinson in the flat or Dustin Keller over the middle or maybe even try Braylon Edwards on a five yard slant or deep go route? Get creative, get more than six first downs, and you have to do better than 1/11 on third down conversions. Even a sub par performance from a mediocore QB could have led this group into the end zone against the stout Raven's Defense. The Jets will be losing alot more than one game this year with Sanchez at QB, just like they did last year.

Mark Sanchez had the best running game and defense in the NFL last year, but had a weak 12 touchdowns and 20 interceptions (with a QB Rating of 62.7). Yes, it was his rookie season and yes he did play much better in the playoffs last season, but he is in no way ready to win in the NFL. Sanchez threw a mere 68 times in those three playoff games, as he sat back most of the time letting the running game and defense carry the team. The Jets improved their overall roster immensely over the off season, but failed to address the most key position on their football team (the quarterback). They also did not re-sign their best running back in Thomas Jones (1,400 yards and 14 TD in 2009) abandoning one of their strengths. Any good coach knows to play to your strengths and the New York Jets have strayed away from one of their best strengths, running the football. With a less effective running game Sanchez is even more exposed as a poor passer and the Jets have the wrong man at the helm for their offense. Perhaps some day he will improve and emerge as a true leader, but its hard to see that coming any time soon.



The last time the Patriots faced the Jets Mark Sanchez threw four interceptions and lost a fumble in a   31-14 defeat. In New York this Sunday Sanchez will have a better outing, but will not be able to keep pace with the Patriots offense. The Jets strategy to win is to run the ball, get turnovers and stops on defense, and have the Quarterback not lose the game. (commonly named "game manager" approach). The Patriots offense is far too explosive with a healthy Tom Brady, his new tight ends, old favorites (Welker and Moss) and the momentum from an impressive week 1. Rex Ryan's defense will put some pressure on Brady and probably even cause a turnover or two, but in the end Patriots 24 Jets 13 does not get you a win.


Sources Used

www.espn.com
www.si.com
www.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/basketball/nba/
www.weei.com


Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Why Shaq Lobbied for and Joined The Celtics


When Kobe Bryant won his fifth NBA Championship he boasted having more rings than Shaquille O'neal, the man so many said Kobe could not win without. Now Shaq has begun his road to redemption, by choosing a team that he knows has a great chance to reclaim the NBA throne. No longer in his prime Shaq will offer no bold statements of grandeur, but with a workman-like approach he will fly under the radar. Shaq will make his statements on the court and is going to take the NBA by surprise, yes as a bench player, but the impact will be felt.

The reason Shaq lobbied to join the Boston Celtics was because he felt they had the best chance to return to the NBA Finals. Even in the wake of the assembly of "Super Team" (the Miami Heat) Shaq wanted to join a new team that he felt had the best chance. Not asking to rejoin Kobe, Dwyane Wade, or Lebron James, but to join the aging Big Three. Shaq won without Kobe and he will join the Celtics to win without Wade. O'neal could have lobbied to join any number of teams (as their was interest) in the early offseason and  could have joined the Hawks or Pistons for eight million dollars (far more than the Celtics will pay him) towards the end. Shaq put it best by  saying: "..it was about being somewhere, being seen, and winning." (O'neal)

The main reason the Celtics lost against the Lakers in Game 7 was a serious lack of size and ultimately rebounding. With Kendrick Perkins out for the season finale the C's were left with an undersized power forward (in Glen Davis) and Rasheed Wallace for big men. The result was a Laker victory in rebounding (53-40) and another Championship for LA. Shaq O'neal gives the Celtics an immense rebounder and shot blocker that can still bully around most centers in the NBA.

When Shaq was lobbying to join the Celtics well before any contract was offered, I knew this was significant. Shaq's main goal is to win another ring, but he wants to do it on his own terms. He does not want to just jump aboard one of his old teams to win another title, he wants to earn it. Shaq felt and feels that Boston is the best place for him to get another crack at the Finals. With four rings he will only need one more to complete what I'll call the "Hand". Five rings give Shaq Hand status and all Boston Celtics fans should be thrilled for his arrival.


Sources Used

www.espn.com
www.si.com
www.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/basketball/nba/
www.weei.com

Sunday, July 11, 2010

The Celtic Response


Now that the "Super Team" has been created in Miami, what have the Boston Celtics done and what will they do to stay in the upper echelon of the Eastern Conference? At this point in the off season the Celtics have been able to bring back head coach Doc Rivers, small forward Paul Pierce, and shooting guard Ray Allen. Boston also welcomed a new member to the team with the signing of center Jermaine O'neal. This is a good move for the C's who are desperate for big man help with the pending retirement of Rasheed Wallace and the serious injury to Kendrick Perkins (keeping him out 5-6 months).

Last season with the Miami Heat O'neal averaged 13.6 points, 6.9 rebounds, and 1.4 blocks per game, but was dreadful in the postseason against the Celtics. Perhaps he was not motivated in a series that did not believe could be won or perhaps he is just not cut out to be the number two option on his team anymore. The knock on O'neal is that he cannot stay healthy and that he does not work hard at his craft. Last season he did miss twelve games due to injury, but played well during his time on the court. As far as his work ethic is concerned the Big Four and Doc will handle that, not to worry. It will prove to be a better signing than the acquisition of Sheed, because O'neal will actually give you a strong regular season performance by helping the Celtics with the consistency issue (that plagued them last year). O'neal still has great post moves that allow him to score in double figures and at 6'11 is able to rebound and block shots. He is a great fit here in Boston because he does not have to be the # 2 go to guy on the team and he adds much needed depth to the center/power forward position.

The good news of the summer is that Rivers, Pierce, and Allen are all returning and Jermaine O'neal has been added. The bad news is that there are still many holes to fill on this team and Tony Allen is no longer a Boston Celtic. This is a terrible move by Danny Ainge and the Celtic ownership because T.A. was the best one on one defender on the team. He played great defense on Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and many other top level opponents, along with bringing energy and athleticism off the bench. The Celtics need to get younger as a team and deeper on the bench, this loss of Tony Allen hurts you on all fronts, not a good move. What will be the Celtic response to the influx and repositinoing of talent that has occurred in Eastern Conference? We will all have to just wait and see, but to stay in the running for a championship, Boston will need to add more pieces.

Info + Photos:
www.espn.com
www.si.com
www.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/basketball/nba/
www.weei.com




Thursday, July 8, 2010

Picking up the Pieces


“This team was crazy close” said Doc Rivers, in what was the aftermath reflection of his team’s Game 7 defeat. "We had to keep subbing him for one minute and two minutes, and I thought the reason we got up early was because of Rasheed Wallace. We got in the low post, he started scoring, and I thought what happend was late in the game he got tired and had the injuries and we couldn't go down anymore, and I think that had a huge impact on how we were playing. We had to go away from the post almost because of fatigue. It's the first time all year that you can actually say, at the end of the day, we were old at the end of the game because we didn't have enough bodies. I thought it hurt us" (Doc Rivers). There is no quote that could more accurately sum up the devastating championship loss, as the Celtics just didn't have enough horses at the end.


  In the Championship season of 2007/2008 the Boston Celtics were able to attain Banner 17 because they had contributions from a whole host of players on the roster. P.J. BrownLeon PoweSam CassellTony AllenGlen DavisEddie House, and James Posey gave the Celtics a team that was twelve men deep. In this year's playoff run the bench contributions came from Nate Robinson, Glen Davis, Rasheed Wallace, and Tony Allen. Marquis Daniels and Michael Finley were capable contributors, but were never truly intregrated into the team. There is no way for me to say that they would have won Game 7 with these men playing, but this lack of depth truly hurt the Celtics.


  With Rasheed coming off the bench Boston had enough depth, but this was no longer true when Kendrick Perkins went down with a season ending injury. When Sheed was forced to become a starter the depth of the team and bench suffered severely. The bench was now only three players deep with Nate, Tony, and Baby and as Doc Rivers said without  Perkins available, Rasheed grew fatigued. As we all saw in 2008, to win a title you need star players, but you also need a roster that can delve down into the depth chart for contributions. That year the NBA Title went to the team that was twelve men deep, the Boston Celtics.This true team depth is needed even more so if you are trying to defeat a younger, bigger, and more talented team such as the Lakers.


  In Game 7 of the 2010 NBA Finals the Celtics were only eight men deep and they were unable to win. Doc's lack of trust in Nate Robinson and Tony Allen (only giving them nine minutes combined) was evident. Also, there were no true back ups at the center or power forward positions with Perkins being hurt. His absecne and the absecne of the starting five is what lost the game. "I told our guys this, the starting lineup still hasn't lost. It was a shame we didn't have that starting lineup tonight. But I told them, you're still yet to have a true chance to defend your title because Perk wasn't there." (Doc Rivers). How do you pick up the pieces from this loss and move on? Bring back the starting lineup of the Big Four and Perkins, add some new pieces to the bench, and embark on another title quest.






       
                                                                        www.espn.com
www.si.com
www.http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/basketball/nba/
www.weei.com